Upcoming events

    • 9 Apr 2026
    • 5:15 PM - 6:30 PM
    • In person at Ashurst: floor 8, 39 Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000, or online via Zoom
    Register

    Please join us for a special AIPPI seminar with the Honourable David Yates SC

    The presentation will compare two views about the application of inevitable result.  It will consider how the doctrine of inevitable result applies having regard to s 7(1) of the 1990 Act,  having regard to some some cases which appear to mark a departure from the old view of lack of novelty under the Patents Act 1952 (Cth).  It will also consider whether Lord Hoffman's views in Merrell Dow as to the width of the doctrine conform with s 7(1) (despite the acceptance of his views in Australia).  

    Registration is free for members and $40 for non-members.

    The Honourable David Yates SC was a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia for 15 years until his retirement on 30 November 2024. During his time on the Court, he was one of the National Coordinating Judges in the Intellectual Property NPA and, for a number of years, one of the Court’s National Appeals Coordinating Judges.  Throughout his appointment, he was one of the Court’s Corporations (later, Commercial and Corporations) Duty Judges.  He was also a Deputy President of the Australian Competition Tribunal (25 August 2016 to 24 August 2021). As a Judge, he sat on cases at first instance and on appeal across the Court’s broad jurisdiction, with a particular focus on intellectual property law, consumer protection law, corporations law, competition law, and general commercial law.  He presided over a number of significant class actions and regulatory actions.

    Prior to his appointment to the Federal Court, he practised as a solicitor from July 1977 until he was called to the Bar in June 1982.  At the Bar, he practised mainly in intellectual property law, competition law, and general commercial law.  He was appointed as Senior Counsel in 1997.  He is the original author of the commentary and precedents in the section on Intellectual Property in Federal Civil Litigation Precedents published by LexisNexis.

    David Yates practises as a barrister in a general advisory role, and as a mediator and referee.


Past events

13 Nov 2025 2025 Annual General Meeting, 13 Nov 2025
14 Sep 2025 Australian Group drinks at AIPPI Yokohama
31 Jul 2025 Sandoz AG v Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH [2024] FCAFC 135: is the test for assessing inventive step in Alphapharm still law in Australia?
20 Mar 2025 2025 Study Questions Forum
28 Nov 2024 Neurim and enforcement of Swiss-style claims
28 Nov 2024 2024 Annual General Meeting, 28 Nov 2024
20 Oct 2024 Australian Group drinks at AIPPI Hangzhou
29 Aug 2024 Indirect liability for IP infringements
18 Apr 2024 2024 Study Questions Forum
6 Dec 2023 The Arbitration of IP Disputes
21 Nov 2023 Use as a Trade Mark: Recent Cases
21 Nov 2023 2023 Annual General Meeting
13 Apr 2023 How to reclaim creative labour markets from Big Tech and Big Content to get artists paid
30 Mar 2023 Are unregistered designs dead and buried?
23 Mar 2023 Court frowns on reputation principle: a discussion of the implications of Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8
23 Nov 2022 The Experimental Use Exemption: Jusand v Rattlejack
23 Nov 2022 2022 Annual General Meeting
27 Oct 2022 Metaverse, NFTs, and XR: How intellectual property rights are regulating this "new" frontier
1 Sep 2022 Rapid Response Seminar - Aristocrat v Commissioner of Patents [2022] HCA 29
26 May 2022 Unpacking Non-Fungible Tokens - a panel discussion
19 May 2022 Competition or Co-ordination? Exploring the ACCC’s interest in pharmaceutical patent settlements
26 Apr 2022 2022 Study Questions Forum
7 Apr 2022 The Assignment of Copyright in the Aboriginal Flag
31 Mar 2022 Rapid Response Seminar: The High Court’s decision in Lundbeck v Sandoz
25 Nov 2021 By the grace of s 24 – grace period developments
25 Nov 2021 2021 Annual General Meeting
30 Sep 2021 You’ve got to be kidding! A take on recent cases concerning parody and satire in copyright and trade mark infringement proceedings
26 Aug 2021 "That's a nice patent you've got there...": Waiver of patents in a pandemic
5 Aug 2021 Rapid Response: Thaler v Commissioner of Patents - the court recognises that artificial intelligence systems can invent
15 Jul 2021 Recent cases on trade mark distinctiveness
29 Apr 2021 Fearless Girl - State Street v Maurice Blackburn
27 Apr 2021 2021 AIPPI Australia Questions Forum
25 Feb 2021 Unregistered trade marks – some lessons from Kraft v Bega and some persisting uncertainties
17 Dec 2020 AIPPI Rapid Response: Calidad v Seiko
30 Nov 2020 2020 Annual General Meeting
23 Nov 2020 Support after RTB - a discussion of MSD v. Wyeth
27 Oct 2020 Unwired Planet v Huawei & Others [2020] UKSC 37: The judgment and its implications
16 Sep 2020 The Copyright/Design Overlap under Review – do we actually need a Designs Act?
27 Aug 2020 Final Injunctions in Patent Cases
23 Jul 2020 AIPPI Rapid Response: Rokt and Aristocrat
2 Jun 2020 AIPPI Australia Questions Forum
21 May 2020 AIPPI Rapid Response: Commonwealth v Sanofi (clopidogrel)
2 Dec 2019 Manner of Manufacture and Encompass
30 Oct 2019 Enjoin or Expedite: Is this the New Dilemma for Patentees in Australia?
15 Sep 2019 AIPPI Congress London: Australian group drinks
29 Aug 2019 Best method: Pitfalls for patentees arising out of recent cases
25 Jun 2019 Ethics & Professional Responsibility for IP Attorneys
7 May 2019 AIPPI Australia Study Questions Forum - 7 May 2019
2 May 2019 A History of Intellectual Property in One Object: The Dubious Past (and Glorious Future) of Barbie™
22 Nov 2018 Joint Infringements and Company Directors
22 Nov 2018 Annual General Meeting
22 Aug 2018 Intellectual Property National pilot scheme
22 Aug 2018 QLD - A dialogue with IP Australia: your Practical Patent,Trade Mark & Designs Problems addressed by IP Australia


© Copyright 2023 AIPPI Australia

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software